With the
success of his new book, How to Be a Star at Work: Nine Breakthrough
Strategies You Need to Succeed, it seems that Robert Kelley is all over
the place. He's been interviewed by everyone from the New York Times
and the Washington Post to Good Morning America and People magazine.
An
adjunct professor of organizational behavior and theory at Carnegie
Mellon University, and armed with a PhD and two previous successful
books, Kelley is no stranger to success. That's not to say that it came
easily. Ironically, the very project that led him to write How to Be a
Star at Work did not initially seem to be successful at all.
Kelley
and a small group of researchers had been assigned the task of
identifying the common characteristics of a company's "star" workers.
Their goal was to work those attributes into a recipe for everyone in
the company. In other words, learn from the best and pass it on to the
rest to increase overall productivity.
After
four years of research, he had to stand in front of the people who
hired him at Bell Labs and confess that the results of his study were
inconclusive. Kelley was surprised: the people in the meeting took the
news fairly well.
"They did
not give up," he recalls. "Because of the genuine interest in bettering
the company, Bell Labs took my report and began asking questions that
eventually enabled us to get on the correct path. You might say that
from the ashes of that meeting arose the Phoenix of success."
The
results of Kelley's second run at the problem were surprising -- and
quite encouraging. "After six more years, in essence, what we
discovered was that star workers are made, not born," Kelley says.
"Contrary to popular belief, stars are not workaholics. It's not true
that they work longer hours to get ahead. In fact, stars tend to work
less than their co-workers."
Kelley
has also come to the conclusion that exceptionally productive workers
are no more intelligent than their peers. "On average, their co-workers
were just as intelligent. We also found that there were no special
personality traits for star workers -- some were shy, some outgoing,
some neat, some messy."
Kelley
found that all of the stars did share nine strategies which he defines
as: initiative, networking, self-management, perspective,
"followership," leadership, teamwork, organizational savvy, and
show-and-tell. In the workplace, stars set themselves apart using all
nine of the strategies, which enables them to work smarter and faster
than others.
"Co-workers
and bosses know there is 'white space' work that is not assigned. Stars
take the initiative in the white spaces of unassigned work and excel at
it, but by the same token they also tend to avoid make-work jobs. Stars
spend less time on teams and all of them have a very good ability to
keep their eye on the bottom line."
To the
unconvinced, Kelley offers the following example: "Take, for instance,
two reporters. The star reporter will have excellent sources and better
connections that enable him to get the story right the first time. The
other reporter might not have the same people to rely on in his
network, so he spends more time checking his sources for accuracy. The
result is that the star might get his story in by 10 a.m., whereas the
other reporter might finish his story by 3 in the afternoon. The big
savings comes in the form of time. The star reporter may cover
two-and-a-half or three stories in a day, while the other may cover
only one."
When
asked to give an example of a historic figure that utilized the nine
strategies, Kelley responds, "Leonardo da Vinci, Madame Curie, or
perhaps Freud. Freud built a very good network; the level of his
correspondence was phenomenal. He was interested in multiple
perspectives and ranged widely in his reading and literature."
However,
he warns, "There is a big difference between historical figures and
today, because business is set up so differently." This raises the
question, how can individuals manning the workforce today apply
Kelley's research to their own career?
According
to Kelley, the self-help tapes probably aren't as useful for motivating
workers as some would argue. "Most training programs ask people to
change themselves, to become a certain prototype. Well, no one wants to
be a clone of someone else."
Instead,
Kelley suggests that workers make the most of their own assets. "The
key is to be mentored early on to a star you can identify with. For
instance, if you are not a neat person and have never had a tidy desk a
day in your life, pattern yourself after a top producer with a messy
desk."
In short,
don't fight nature. Kelley says, "If someone realizes that they are
perhaps a bit shy, they should recognize that and say, 'Well, I'll
do...[networking] by computer rather than on the phone.' Both are
successful methods of networking and accomplish the same end."
Kelley
has tried to provide a success strategy that takes reality and common
sense into consideration. Far from elitist, Kelley proposes, "People
come with unique talents. Some talents are very unique. However, it is
just not true that certain people have an innate ability to do better.
True, stars are born with a lot, but so is everybody else."
Kelley
has concluded that there simply is no recipe to success. "It is like a
buffet -- you have to have certain essentials. However, because people
can pick and choose from something, everyone builds their own unique
combination."